Whitepaper

4.1 Wallet Balance Although this indicator doesn't inherently indicate reputation, when combined with others it does illustrate the wallet holder is invested in the Solana ecosystem, especially when the wallet balance is maintained for a long period of time. As expected, a higher wallet balances are perceived with higher reputation, and as such, very low balances are penalized. 4.2 Transaction Volume Regular activity over a long period of time indicates the wallet is legitimate and therefore more reputable. Low transaction volume doesn't inherently imply lower reputation although it's marginally penalized. Wallets with extremely high transaction volume may indicate the wallet is operated by a bot. As such, these wallets are heavily penalized. To receive no or a low penalty on this indicator, wallets should maintain a reasonable level of transaction volume over an extended period of time. 4.3 Dormancy Dormancy, or time since last transaction, is a considerable indicator into a wallet's reputation. Large periods of time since a transaction indicates the wallet is not frequently used. 4.4 Transaction failure rate High transaction failure rate may imply lower wallet reputation in several ways: * Poor understanding of the network (insufficient gas fees, improper transaction construction) * Attempts to front-run or engage in high-frequency activities without proper optimization * Interaction with poorly written smart contracts 4.5 Prioritization Fee Metrics Two metrics form this indicator: average fee and fee standard deviation. Lower standard deviation implies higher wallet reputation as it reflects higher stability towards transaction management and a consistent strategy. Higher average prioritization fees also imply higher wallet reputation as it can imply the wallet is more confident in their transactions and take active approaches to mitigate front-running attempts.